The Impact of Neighborhood Deprivation on Glycemic Control for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes During Pregnancy.

Background: The impact of neighborhood level factors on glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes is understudied. The primary objective was to determine whether there is an association between glycemic control during pregnancy and level of neighborhood deprivation, defined by area deprivation index (ADI). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with type 2 diabetes who received care at a tertiary referral center from 2007 to 2017. Patients living in more deprived neighborhoods (ADI >85th national percentile) were compared to those living in less deprived neighborhoods (ADI ≤85th percentile). The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over time. Demographic characteristics were compared between groups, and trends in mean A1c through each trimester were tested with repeated measures analysis. Results: Of 237 women meeting study criteria, 93 (39.2%) lived in less deprived (low ADI) and 144 (60.8%) lived in more deprived neighborhoods (high ADI). Women living in more deprived neighborhoods were more likely to be Black (86.8% vs. 53.8%, p < 0.01), less likely to be married (11.3% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.01), and had more severe diabetes (p = 0.05). Both groups achieved significant improvement in HbA1c across each trimester using repeated measures analysis. Those living in more deprived neighborhoods had significantly more improvement in HbA1c from their initial visit to the third trimester compared to those in less deprived neighborhoods, (p = 0.01) such that there was no longer a statistically significant disparity in HbA1c by the third trimester (6.69 ± 0.97 Less deprived vs. 6.95 ± 1.22 more deprived, p = 0.19). Conclusions: Low-income women living in more deprived neighborhoods enter pregnancy with significantly worse glycemic control than those living in less deprived neighborhoods, but the gap in glycemic control largely closes by the end of pregnancy with similar maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Impact of a novel smartphone application on low-income, first-time mothers' breastfeeding rates: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-income women are less likely to exclusively breastfeed at postpartum day 2 compared with high-income women, but focus groups of low-income women have suggested that on-demand videos on breastfeeding and infant behavior would support exclusive breastfeeding beyond postpartum day 2. Smartphone applications provide on-demand video. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether a novel smartphone application-Breastfeeding Friend-increases breastfeeding rates for low-income, first-time mothers. STUDY DESIGN: This double-blinded randomized trial recruited low-income, first-time mothers at 36 weeks' gestation. Consenting women received a complimentary Android smartphone and internet service before 1:1 randomization to Breastfeeding Friend or a control smartphone application. Breastfeeding Friend was created by a multidisciplinary team of perinatologists, neonatologists, lactation consultants, and a middle school teacher and was refined by end-user focus groups. Breastfeeding Friend contained on-demand education and videos on breastfeeding and newborn behavior, tailored to a fifth-grade reading level. The control smartphone application contained digital breastfeeding handouts. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding at postpartum day 2; secondary outcomes were breastfeeding rates until 6 months postpartum and patient-reported best breastfeeding resource. Primary statistical analyses compared outcomes between study groups through intention-to-treat analysis; prespecified secondary analyses did so per protocol. A total of 170 women (85 per arm) were needed to determine whether Breastfeeding Friend increased exclusive breastfeeding at postpartum day 2 from 34% (known baseline) to 56%. RESULTS: A total of 253 women were approached; 170 women enrolled. Most participants were black, with more than half reporting annual household incomes of less than $25,000. Exclusive breastfeeding rates at postpartum day 2 were low and similar among Breastfeeding Friend and control smartphone application users (n=30 [36.6%] vs n=30 [35.7%]; relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.068-1.53). Breastfeeding rates until 6 months postpartum were also similar between study groups: the rate of exclusive breastfeeding was 8.3% (n=5) and 10.4% (n=7) in the Breastfeeding Friend and control smartphone application groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.38). At 6 weeks postpartum, most Breastfeeding Friend smartphone application users (n=34 [52.3%]) rated their smartphone application as providing the best breastfeeding support. Excluding women who did not use their study smartphone application (Breastfeeding Friend, n=18 [21.4%]; control smartphone application, n=9 [10.6%]) did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSION: Neither of the smartphone applications improved breastfeeding rates among low-income, first-time mothers above the known baseline rates, despite user perception that Breastfeeding Friend was the best breastfeeding resource at 6 weeks postpartum. By demonstrating the feasibility of smartphone application-based interventions within a particularly high-needs population, our research supports efforts in obstetrics to examine whether mobile health improves peripartum health outcomes.